Angelina Pivarnick flaunts figure amid JWoww boyfriend drama

Reality TV

“Jersey Shore” star Angelina Pivarnick has broken her silence after she was accused of flirting with fellow cast member Jenni “JWoww” Farley‘s boyfriend Zack Carpinello.

The 33-year-old reality star shared a sexy photo of herself Sunday wearing only lingerie, and quoted Audrey Hepburn in the caption of her boudoir photo.

Pivarnick wrote, “I believe in being strong when everything seems to be going wrong. I believe that happy girls are the prettiest girls.. I believe tomorrow is another day, and I believe in miracles.” She has removed all the comments from the post.

On last week’s episode of “Jersey Shore,” Pivarnick was filmed dancing beside Carpinello, 25, while Farley, 33, appeared too intoxicated to notice.

Meanwhile, Carpinello contributed to the flirtatious behavior by getting touchy-feely with Pivarnick.

After the MTV show aired, Farley spoke out saying she felt “hurt” and “disrespected.”

Jenni "JWoww" Farley and Zack Carpinello
Jenni “JWoww” Farley and Zack CarpinelloGetty Images

“My heart hurts on so many levels,” she wrote. “One thing I learned from tonight’s episode is know your value. Don’t ever lower your standards.”

It is unclear whether Farley and Carpinello are still dating. Her rep declined to comment.

Over the weekend, Carpinello publicly apologized to JWoww on Instagram.

He wrote, “I love Jenni, with everything I have, I make this known to her every day. I will continue to do everything to make this known to her kids, who also have my heart. I will make it certain that nothing like this ever happen again, in any way regardless of the outcome.”

Pivarnick has not responded to Page Six’s requests for comment.

Articles You May Like

Audiobook review of Notes from an Island by Tove Jansson
Scarlett Johansson Reacts to Colin Jost’s NSFW Joke About Her on SNL
Fashion giants Zalando & ABOUT YOU announce merger deal
Questlove to Direct New Documentary on Saturday Night Live Musical Guests
Ghana’s Supreme Court dismisses challenges to “gay propaganda” law