Four gay men beaten, banished and arrested in Ghana for ‘just trying to live’

LGBTQ Entertainment News, News

In Ghana, four reportedly gay men are thrashed. (Twitter)

Four men were brutally beaten with sticks and banished for being gay in Tamale, Ghana, capturing the rising tensions – and fears – over an anti-LGBT+ bill.

The men, according to graphic video footage seen by activists, were violently battered by a Choggu community leader as a crowd gathered to watch on Tuesday (19 October).

According to Pulse, a Ghanian news outlet, a gay couple in the town attacked his ex-partner with a machete.

The pair were later interrogated, where the local authorities came to realise the men were gay, the outlet claimed, and named two other gay men involved in the scuffle.

They were then handed to the town’s chief, Naa Alhassan Mohammed, for further “interrogation” by Choggu elders.

But this included the men being thrashed by one of the town’s elders, Rightify Ghana, one of the country’s most outspoken LGBT+ groups which obtained footage of the beating, told PinkNews.

Mohammed fined the four suspects GH¢1200 and a ram each to “pacify the gods”.

In his ruling, Mohammed described homosexuality as “against the land and Islam”, adding that “if [Choggu] was in an Islamic state, they would have stoned them to death”.

“What they have done is desecrating the land and it against the gods,” he said. “May God expose all those in this act.”

‘For just trying to live, these gay men were beaten,’ says Ghana activist group

The four men have since been turned to the Tamale police and charged, with a court date set for 4 November, Rightify Ghana added.

“For just trying to live, exist and thrive, these four gay men were beaten and fined by the people and Chief of Chogu, before turning them over to the Tamale police, and now the police have already sent them to court,” Rightify Ghana said in a statement.

The group added that the chief banished the four men from the town.

For Rightify Ghana, such hostility against queer people has only worsened in recent months as a backbitingly anti-LGBT+ bill is being rammed through parliament by a bloc of homophobic lawmakers and backed by religious leaders.

The wide-reaching “Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill 2021” would introduce a raft of policies punishing everything from sex toys and anal intercourse to trans healthcare and LGBT+ allyship.

LGBT+ rights Ghana
Samuel Nartey George, one of the lawmakers bringing forward a law to ban the promotion of LGBT+ rights. (Facebook)

From those providing or receiving gender-affirming healthcare to those who are an ally, the legislation would threaten countless members and supporters of the LGBT+ community with three to five years in prison.

Simply holding hands or kissing a member of the same gender on the cheek would be criminalised.

After all, the bill is named after the National Coalition for Proper Human Sexual Rights and Family Values – one of Ghana’s most vicious anti-LGBT+ groups.

Lawmakers have brought the bill forward at breakneck speed since it was announced in March this year by parliamentarian Samuel Nartey George.

“Before the far-reaching anti-LGBTQ bill was sent to parliament, we were recording human rights violations,” Rightify Ghana said.

“However, the situation has worsened as our fears about the bill have started happening. Many more people are facing physical attacks, evictions have doubled, also we are seeing arbitrary arrests.”

The anti-LGBTQ bill, even though not passed, has emboldened homophobes to mobilise against LGBTQ Ghanaians,” it added.

“The situation is especially worse for LGBTQ persons who live in rural communities, who face almost twice the risk of those in the larger cities.”

Articles You May Like

The National Book Critics Circle Fiction Longlist Announced
Matt Gaetz freaks out as House committee votes to release investigation into alleged sex abuse
The Biggest Publishing News of the Week
Paige DeSorbo, Craig Conover “Going to Break Up”
Texas school district bans the Bible because of its “patently offensive” sexual content